adjustercom.com
adjustercom.net
The Stockwell Firm adjustercom publishes your thoughts and ideas...
Home
News

 Features


Other Claims News
People
Forums
The Comp Examiner Directory
The Liability Adjuster Directory
Service Provider Directory
Post a Job
View Jobs
Resumes
View Resumes
Contact Us

Adjusters Friend

jobs.adjustercom.com

 

Place Your Banner Here With A Click

 

adjustercom.net - FraudFromInsideAndOutsideTheCourtroom

 


Welcome Guest! | Login | Register with adjustercom
 
 
News

News Archive

Email a Friend Email A Friend

More News

April 25, 2024
California Department of Industrial Relations and Cal/OSHA Will Honor Workers’ Memorial Day at Four Events in California on April 28th-29th 2024. Cal/OSHA Joining Partners in Arcadia, Richmond, San Diego and San Francisco.

April 23, 2024
California Division of Workers' Compensation Launches Online Portal for Submission of QME Medical-Legal Reports

April 22, 2024
California Division of Workers’ Compensation Posts Updated Time of Hire Notice

April 22, 2024
Sullivan on Comp Launches ChatSOC. It's an Innovative Chatbot for California Workers' Compensation Professionals Integrated with an Authoritative Legal Treatise



Four Alarm Legal Fire at Fireman’s Fund
By Robert Warne - July 31, 2003

Fireman’s Fund attorneys’ conduct has sparked a federal appeals court decision to allow General Refractories Co. (GRC) to sue the carrier for abuse of process.

The dispute began when GRC was subject to a number of asbestos-related personal injury suits. As the cost of litigation mounted, GRC tapped Fireman’s Fund, its excess insurer to kick in its coverage.

The policy according to Fireman’s Fund had a total coverage limit of $5 million, but GRC insisted that the policy had three annual coverage limits of $5 million per year, or $15 million in total excess coverage.

Things heated up to a point where GRC moved to have Fireman’s Fund and its attorney Andrew Butz and defense team from Gilberg & Kiernan sanctioned for discovery and litigation abuses.

Philadelphia Judge, Mark I. Bernstein reviewed GRC’s allegations that Fireman’s Fund and its defense team had hid documents, obstructed discovery and fabricated privilege claims.

Bernstein didn’t like what he saw. In his ruling, according to Law.com, he said the discovery responses, “reveals a clear pattern of delay, stonewalling, deception, obfuscation and pretense. Defendant intentionally withheld critical documents, ignored court orders, permitted false testimony at depositions and misrepresented facts to opposing counsel and the court."

He found that their conduct was inexcusable, and levied a $125,000 fine against the attorneys and booted them off the case. Fireman’s Fund was also assessed a $125,000 fine.

The sanctions survived the appeal process and GRC then filed a new suit in state court, that alleged abuse of process, bad faith and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing for the same alleged conduct.

GRC ran into some legal resistance this time around in court after a U.S. District Judge dismissed the claims.

But on appeal, a three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously found that the district judge had misinterpreted the claim and cleared the way for the suit to proceed.

 
 

 Hot Jobs


Adjuster / Examiner
Claims Examiner
Santa Ana Unified School District
Santa Ana, CA
View All Jobs

The J Morey Company

Build Your Brand

jobs.adjustercom.com

The J Morey Company


    Copyright 2024 | Privacy Policy | Feedback |  

Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.