adjustercom.com
adjustercom.net
The Stockwell Firm adjustercom publishes your thoughts and ideas...
Home
News

 Features


Other Claims News
People
Forums
The Comp Examiner Directory
The Liability Adjuster Directory
Service Provider Directory
Post a Job
View Jobs
Resumes
View Resumes
Contact Us

Adjusters Friend

jobs.adjustercom.com

 

Place Your Banner Here With A Click

 

adjustercom.net - FraudFromInsideAndOutsideTheCourtroom

 


Welcome Guest! | Login | Register with adjustercom
 
 
News

News Main Page

Email a Friend Email A Friend

More News

April 25, 2024
California Department of Industrial Relations and Cal/OSHA Will Honor Workers’ Memorial Day at Four Events in California on April 28th-29th 2024. Cal/OSHA Joining Partners in Arcadia, Richmond, San Diego and San Francisco.

April 23, 2024
California Division of Workers' Compensation Launches Online Portal for Submission of QME Medical-Legal Reports

April 22, 2024
California Division of Workers’ Compensation Posts Updated Time of Hire Notice

April 22, 2024
Sullivan on Comp Launches ChatSOC. It's an Innovative Chatbot for California Workers' Compensation Professionals Integrated with an Authoritative Legal Treatise



Colorado Worker Shows Head Injury Happened as a Consequence of a Knock on the Head at Work
By Lonce Lamonte - April 15, 2024

In Kiowa v. Industrial Claims Appeals Office, No. 2024COA36 (Colo. Ct. App. 04/11/24), the court determined that evidence showed a knock on the head a worker experienced on the job led to symptoms requiring two cranial surgeries.

A public works manager for a town was repairing a chain on a street sweeper when he hit his head on a piece of equipment. The blow made him feel dazed, dizzy, and wobbly right away.

But after about a month, the manager's wife took him to an emergency room because he was feeling wobbly and dragging his foot. The manager underwent an emergency craniotomy for evacuation of a subdural hematoma.  A CT scan had showed a large collection of fluid compressing the right side of his brain.
 
After the manager was discharged from the hospital, he had a seizure.  Doctors then performed another craniotomy. Following this next craniotomy, the claimant continued to have cognitive difficulties and was unable to return to work.

When the claimant-manager, through counsel, filed a workers' compensation claim, the town filed a notice of contest, denying that the injuries were work-related.

An administrative law judge ruled that the injury occurred in the course and scope of employment and ordered the town to pay all reasonably necessary, authorized, and related medical benefits along with temporary total disability.  And so did the panel.

If you're looking for compliance information from Colorado or anywhere else in the U.S., you're looking for Simply Research

The town appealed to court, arguing that the manager was not injured through the course of his employment but that two incidents which occurred at home or near his home on personal time caused his injury.  The claimant scraped his head on the door of a shed and fell out of his boat while cleaning it.

Longstanding precedent in Colorado, which was handed down in Prouse v. Industrial Commission, 194 P. 625 (Colo. 1920), has maintained that a workers' compensation claimant must establish a definitive time, place, and cause of injury.

Workers' Comp 101: In Colorado, an injury occurs "in the course of employment" when it takes place within the time and place limits of the employment relationship and during an activity connected with the employee's job-related functions, and an injury "arises out of" employment when it has it origin in an employee's work-related functions and is sufficiently related to those functions to be considered part of the employee's employment contract. Horodyskyj v. Karanian, 32 P.3d 470 (Colo. 2001).

The court upheld the rulings from the panel and the administrative law judge in the manager's favor, citing:

•Testimony from the claimant's wife that he started showing the effects and symptoms of a subdural hematoma shortly after the street sweeper incident, including changes in speech, memory loss, slowness of reactions or actions, and loss of function in his upper extremities.
•A town administrator noticed that "something was not right" with the claimant after the incident.

The court found that the administrative law judge and the panel followed precedent in reaching their rulings.

"The time, place, and cause were traced through the testimony of (the claimant), his wife, and his surgeon," the court wrote. "We cannot say that the administrative law judge or the Panel erred as a matter of law by concluding that (the claimant) established a reasonably definite time and place of the accident."

lonce@adjustercom.com, Lonce Lamonte, journalist, editor, adjustercom, www.adjustercom.com    
 

 
 

 Hot Jobs


Adjuster / Examiner
Claims Examiner
Santa Ana Unified School District
Santa Ana, CA
View All Jobs

The J Morey Company

Build Your Brand

jobs.adjustercom.com

The J Morey Company


    Copyright 2024 | Privacy Policy | Feedback |  

Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.