adjustercom.com
adjustercom.net
The Stockwell Firm adjustercom publishes your thoughts and ideas...
Home
News

 Features


Other Claims News
People
Forums
The Comp Examiner Directory
The Liability Adjuster Directory
Service Provider Directory
Post a Job
View Jobs
Resumes
View Resumes
Contact Us

Adjusters Friend

jobs.adjustercom.com

 

Place Your Banner Here With A Click

 

adjustercom.net - FraudFromInsideAndOutsideTheCourtroom

 


Welcome Guest! | Login | Register with adjustercom
 
 
News

News Archive

Email a Friend Email A Friend

More News

April 22, 2024
California Division of Workers’ Compensation Posts Updated Time of Hire Notice

April 22, 2024
Sullivan on Comp Launches ChatSOC. It's an Innovative Chatbot for California Workers' Compensation Professionals Integrated with an Authoritative Legal Treatise

April 19, 2024
Workers Compensation Bill 2024: One percent of employee’s salary to contribute to workers’ compensation fund in Kenya.

April 15, 2024
Colorado Worker Shows Head Injury Happened as a Consequence of a Knock on the Head at Work



Nevada High Court Denies Bid To Block Doctors' Initiative
By Associated Press - August 25, 2004

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) _ The Nevada Supreme Court has declined to reject a November ballot proposal being pushed by doctors who want medical malpractice reforms tougher than those adopted by the Legislature in 2002.

The court ruled Tuesday against a petition filed by lawyers for the guardians of two medical malpractice victims, the Nevada State AFL-CIO, Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, the Rev. John Auer III, the National Organization for Women and the Nevada Young Activist Project.

The petitioners argued the "Keep Our Doctors in Nevada'' initiative violates both state and federal constitutions and misleads voters because it lacks information necessary to understand its impact.

The secretary of state validated the initiative in December 2002, and the 2003 Legislature failed to act on it. That advanced the proposal to this November's ballot.

"Petitioners present no reason or excuse for why they waited more than a year since it became apparent that the initiative would appear on the November 2004 ballot to file this petition and instead filed it only two weeks before ballots are scheduled to be printed,'' the high court wrote.

"We are not persuaded that we should intervene in these circumstances, especially when petitioners' tardiness caused the emergency and they have offered no explanation for why they are so late in seeking relief,'' justices added.

Lawmakers in 2002 approved a $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases but included some exceptions to the limit.

Doctors qualified their proposal for the November ballot because they didn't believe the Legislature went far enough.

The doctors' measure, if approved by voters, would remove all exemptions to the $350,000 cap and would limit attorney fees.

If approved by voters, it would supersede the 2002 reform passed by the Legislature in efforts to stop doctors from leaving the state because of skyrocketing malpractice insurance rates.

 
 

 Hot Jobs


Adjuster / Examiner
Claims Examiner
Santa Ana Unified School District
Santa Ana, CA
View All Jobs

The J Morey Company

Build Your Brand

jobs.adjustercom.com

The J Morey Company


    Copyright 2024 | Privacy Policy | Feedback |  

Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.