adjustercom.com
adjustercom.net
The Stockwell Firm adjustercom publishes your thoughts and ideas...
Home
News

 Features


Other Claims News
People
Forums
The Comp Examiner Directory
The Liability Adjuster Directory
Service Provider Directory
Post a Job
View Jobs
Resumes
View Resumes
Contact Us

Adjusters Friend

jobs.adjustercom.com

 

Place Your Banner Here With A Click

 

adjustercom.net - FraudFromInsideAndOutsideTheCourtroom

 


Welcome Guest! | Login | Register with adjustercom
 
 
News

News Archive

Email a Friend Email A Friend

More News

April 15, 2024
Colorado Worker Shows Head Injury Happened as a Consequence of a Knock on the Head at Work

April 4, 2024
Callfornia Division of Workers' Compensation Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Meeting Scheduled for April 17, 2024

April 3, 2024
California Division of Workers' Compensation Posts Adjustments to Official Medical Fee Schedule (DMEPOS)

April 2, 2024
California Division of Workers' Compensation Posts Adjustments to Official Medical Fee Schedule for Pathology and Clinical Laboratory



Second Time a Judge Upholds RICO Claims in Rampart
By Robert Warne - April 24, 2001

With 100 convictions overturned in the Rampart police scandal and 135 related civil cases brewing, Los Angeles has been dealt another devastating legal blow. The RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) was upheld a second time in seven months by a federal judge pertaining to Rampart. The ruling by US District Judge Gary A. Feess on April 19 further exposes LA’s liability—which some legal experts are predicting could reach $100 million in total damages.

Coincidentally, LA Mayor Richard Riordan submitted his final outgoing budget on April 20, with $40 million allocated to pay off Rampart claims.

Feess also ruled that LA City Council members can be held liable for damages in Rampart-related cases.

The decision is a weighty one, with Feess presiding over approximately 100 Rampart cases as well as overseeing the consent decree between the city and federal government—in which LAPD could be sued for a pattern or practice of civil rights violations.

Under RICO, to be awarded monetary compensation a plaintiff must prove that he has been injured in his business or property.

The RICO Act was originally designed to curb organized crime in the ’70s. Since its inception the RICO Act has been used in a variety cases involving corrupt financial operations and healthcare fraud. As recently as January 4, 2001 the California State Supreme Court filed an opinion citing the RICO Act in the Vacanti vs. State Compensation Insurance Fund case, allowing this lawsuit to proceed outside the Workers’ Compensation system.

This is the first time that a police department has ever been held liable under the RICO Act.

 
 

 Hot Jobs


Adjuster / Examiner
Claims Examiner
Santa Ana Unified School District
Santa Ana, CA
View All Jobs

The J Morey Company

Build Your Brand

jobs.adjustercom.com

The J Morey Company


    Copyright 2024 | Privacy Policy | Feedback |  

Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.